Contents

  • Histories

    Essays on periods and aspects of New School history, partial and evolving.

  • People

    Profiles of people who have passed through the New School. Entries focus on their time at the school.

  • Reader

    Readings, artworks, and materials by and about people associated with the school, including faculty, staff, and students.

  • Reflections & Analysis

    Personal reminiscence, scholarly commentary, and opinion.

About

This website seeks to explore and interrogate the past at a school dedicated to the new. Contributions by students, staff, faculty, alumni, and researchers.

Editors
Julia L. Foulkes, Professor of History
Mark Larrimore, Associate Professor of Religious Studies
Wendy Scheir, Director, New School Archives and Special Collections

Connections
The New School Archives Digital Collections from the Archives Public Seminar The New School

Contact
[email protected]

Link here to the Style Guide for the Histories of The New School website This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

The discussion by Max Weber on church, sect and mysticism which I introduced in translation in a recent issue of Sociological Analysis, is an exceptional example of the different ways four of the greatest German sociologists related to key issues in the domains of the sociology of religion and the forms of religiosity. The chief themes at issue in their colloquy, though not always so plainly stated, were the varied patterns of relations of churches, sects, mysticisms, rationalisms, rationalizations, and secularizations on the roads to modernity. The main, not the only, participants in the colloquium were Ernst Troeltsch, who initiated the discussion by offering a historic paper on Stoic-Christian natural law,’ Ferdinand Toennies, Georg Simmel, and Weber himself. (A fifth man who figured in the background of these discussions but was not named by any of the discussants was Weber’s close friend, Georg Jellinek, of whom we shall speak below.)

Source:

Sociological Analysis 36.3 (Autumn 1975): 229-240

Download source

Posted on Monday April 23, 2018

Categories: